Quantcast
Channel: What version numbering scheme to use? - Stack Overflow
Browsing all 6 articles
Browse latest View live

Answer by VonC for What version numbering scheme to use?

Note that a version number scheme (like x.y.0 vs. x.y) can be constrained by external factors.Consider that announcement for Git 1.9 (Januaury 2014):A release candidate Git v1.9-rc2 is now available...

View Article



Answer by Tom Anderson for What version numbering scheme to use?

Purely for completeness, i will mention the old Apple standard for version numbers. This looks like major version. minor version. bug version. stage. non-release revision. Stage is a code drawn from...

View Article

Answer by gavenkoa for What version numbering scheme to use?

After reading a lot of articles/QAs/FAQs/books I become to thinkthat [MAJOR].[MINOR].[REV] is most useful versioning schema todescribe compatibility between project version (versioning schemafor...

View Article

Answer by sixohsix for What version numbering scheme to use?

I would recommend the Semantic Versioning standard, which the Maven versioning system also appears to follow. Please check out,http://semver.org/In short it is...

View Article

Answer by Tobu for What version numbering scheme to use?

Here is the current Maven version comparison algorithm, and a discussion of it. As long as versions only grow, and all fields except the build number are updated manually, you're good. Qualifiers work...

View Article


What version numbering scheme to use?

I'm looking for a version numbering scheme that expresses the extent of change, especially compatiblity. Apache APR, for example, use the well known version numbering scheme...

View Article
Browsing all 6 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images